Rework is 5% of your project cost. Half of it is a records problem.
Not bad workmanship, bad data. EXURO runs alongside the systems you already use. It checks every submittal against your spec, documents every change order, and signs every decision. You own the data, and the record.
A submittal lands in Procore on a Tuesday.
The PM means to check it against Division 23, but three RFIs are on fire and the owner wants a schedule update by noon. The submittal gets a skim and an approval. Four months later the fixtures are installed, an inspector flags the UL rating, and now it’s demo, reorder, a twelve-week lead time, and three trades resequenced.
Meanwhile, a change order is “approved” on a phone call. Nobody writes down whether the electrical relocation was in scope. Work starts. Work stops. The email thread hits forty-seven messages, and the question “what exactly did we agree to?” has no answer anyone can prove.
None of this is anyone’s failure. It’s what happens when the record of decisions lives in inboxes, hallways, and a few people’s heads.
It’s not that contractors resist new technology.
It’s that the stakes of switching are brutal. Your systems hold compliance obligations, draw schedules, and payroll. One migration hiccup can mean missing a pay app or failing an audit. So teams rationally stay on what works, and the gaps between those systems stay open.
That’s why EXURO doesn’t replace anything. It runs alongside Procore, your ERP, your schedule, and your spec library. No rip and replace. No new system of record to migrate to. Your tools keep being the tools. EXURO reads across them and writes down what gets decided.
The money tools are getting smarter. The record is still scattered. EXURO is the record layer.
Where the money goes.
Rework eats about 5% of total project cost. 48% of it is caused by poor project data and miscommunication. In one year, that was $31 billion across US builders.
The average North American dispute runs $43 million and takes more than 14 months. Values jumped 42% in a single year. Root cause #1: errors and omissions in contract documents.
Change orders run 7 to 15% of total project cost, with poorly documented scope adding an estimated 15 to 20% on top in coordination waste.
35% of a builder’s week is non-optimal work. About 14 hours per person hunting for project data and resolving conflicts.
41% of the construction workforce retires by 2031. Every undocumented decision is expertise that walks off the job for good. A signed record is where the retiring PM’s judgment actually gets kept.
Across 346 studied projects, rework cut contractors’ average annual profit by 28%.
One wrong fixture. Six months. $720,000.
A modeled example on a $50M commercial build. A fixture gets approved with the wrong UL rating. Nobody catches it for six months. By then it’s installed.
At a 3% margin, that’s 48% of the profit on the entire job.
Caught on Day 45 instead of Day 180, it’s a rejected submittal and a reorder. Nothing more.
| 40 mis-spec’d fixtures replaced | $320,000 |
| Three weeks of idle crew | $220,000 |
| Re-inspection, two floors | $35,000 |
| Schedule cascade into weekend premiums | $145,000 |
| One missed submittal | $720,000 |
It reads, flags, cites, and writes it down.
When a submittal lands, EXURO fetches it, reads it against your spec book section by section, flags any mismatch with the exact paragraph cited, and presents it to your PM for a decision. The approval or rejection is recorded with who and when, and the whole chain is signed: evidence, reasoning, decision.
When a change order comes in, it reads the request against the original scope and the RFI history, separates what was authorized from what’s new, and attaches a signed scope record to the approval. Before anyone mobilizes.
Your team makes every decision. Ask it anything in plain language, like “does this submittal match the spec?” or “what did we approve on the cooling change?”, and get an answer with the evidence attached.
It checks.
Every submittal read against your spec. Mismatches flagged with the section cited.
It documents.
Every change order laid out clearly before you approve: what’s covered, what’s new.
It signs.
Every review is time-stamped and signed into a record that can’t be quietly changed.
Modeled on $300M of annual volume.
A conservative 20% reduction on the preventable share, plus modeled dispute and time savings. These are models, not promises. Your own numbers take 90 days.
Pricing: a fixed implementation fee plus a flat monthly retainer. No per-seat pricing. Your whole team uses it.
| Rework exposure (5% of volume) | $15M |
| The share caused by bad data (48%) | $7.2M |
| Recovered at a careful 20% catch rate | $1.44M / yr |
| Dispute legal and settlement, avoided | ~$400K / yr |
| PM time recovered (4 PMs, 14 hrs each week) | ~$110K / yr |
| Modeled recovery | ≈ $1.9M / yr |
EXURO is new. We don’t have customers yet. Here’s the deal that makes that work for you.
The numbers above are industry research and labeled models, not our customer results, because we don’t have customer results yet. We’re going to be straight about that, because the product is proof and it would be strange to open with anything else.
We’re onboarding a small founding cohort of Texas GCs and developers, teams running $50M+ in annual volume, at pilot pricing. The whole engagement is built so you never have to take our word for anything:
A senior engineer, the person who built the system and not a salesperson, embeds with your team, on-site or over Zoom. We connect Procore and your spec library. Every flag the system raises is validated side by side with your PMs.
The system runs on live projects. Your team reviews flagged items only. We track catch rate, false positives, and dollars intercepted with you, inside the same signed record we’re selling you.
You have your own numbers, on your own jobs, signed. Continue the 12-month term at pilot pricing, or walk with the data.
This is deliberately boutique. We take on few clients, we build around how your operation actually runs, and we stay until it works. The trade you’re making: early-adopter risk in exchange for pilot pricing, direct access to the builder, and a system calibrated to your jobs before anyone else’s.
Most construction software owns one department. The gaps between them are where the money leaks.
EXURO is one signed record that every seat reads through its own lens. Not four products. One record, from the jobsite trailer to the closing table.
The PM in the field asks "does this submittal match the spec?" and decides in minutes instead of hunting a 300-page PDF.
Finance in the back sees every change order with its scope signed: was this authorized, by whom, on what date. The budget stays true without archaeology through email.
Legal pulls the record itself: what was decided, when, against which document version, provably untampered. A dispute becomes a lookup, not fourteen months of discovery.
The owner approves faster because the scope arrives already clean, and holds the same proof you do.
Start with the record. Extend into the back office.
The record is where we start, because it’s where the money leaks. But the same engine works the back office too: matching invoices against commitments, moving AP data between systems without re-keying, checking vendor paperwork before payment. If it lives in your software, EXURO can read it, cross-check it, and write it down.
And when your stack includes something ours doesn’t, we build the connector for you. Custom integrations and custom skills, built on MCP, the open standard that lets AI work with other software. Built once for your operation. Yours to keep.
You don’t buy anything.
When your GC runs EXURO, every change order arrives with a signed scope record: what your request covered, what’s new, which drawing version, who approved what and when.
Approval cycles shrink because the clarification loop is gone. On a $200M job, delay from an unclear approval can carry roughly $70K a day, so recovered days are the whole story. And you see all of it in the Procore access you already have.
The record is only worth something if you own it.
Runs where you decide
Your hardware, a VM you control, or a managed setup where the records stay in your own database. We never aggregate your data.
Your choice of AI
Local models, or providers you already trust. The checking job is narrow. It doesn’t need a frontier model, it needs your specs and your history.
Tamper-evident
Every record is signed and chained. Altering history visibly breaks the chain.
Who’s liable if the AI is wrong?
Your team. Same as today. The system reads and flags; your PM decides; the decision is signed. Without EXURO you’d carry the same exposure with no record. Now you have the record.
Request the pilot brief.
Tell us about your projects and your Procore setup. We’ll send the pilot brief and set up a working session with the people who would build it.
No pressure and no script.